STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of the Petition of WHITMAN COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION Involving Certain Employees of GARFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 302 CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: Mr. Stan Jeffers, Director of organ1z1ng For Employer: Mr. Jeffrey Thimsen, Labor Relations Consultant FINDINGS 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervention in the captioned proceedings; was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were bargaining unit described as: Included: All full-time and supervisory certificated employees. Excluded: Superintendent, principal(s), employees and supervisors 41.59. 4. All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; and have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of all conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the appropriate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: WHITMAN COUNTY EDUCATION as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining with their employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment. Issued at Olympia, Washington, this 19th PUBLIC MARVIN TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) IX I - Representation Election I I - Cross-Check of Records CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: (Check One) IX I - Consent Agreement I I - PERC Direction Case Number 4695-E-83-875 Decision Number 1739 - EDUC OF FACT intervenors above timely moved for and said motion(s) for intervention conducted by the Commission in the regular part-time non-confidential as defined in RCW no meritorious objections OF LAW appropriate unit for the RCW 41.59.080 ; and above named employer employed in the ASSOCIATION day of September, 1983. EMPLOYMENT RELAJIONS / l,/f' L. SCHURKE, Executive Director
! I I STATE OF WASHINGTON .BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION T A L L Y S H E E T NAME OF ~ CASE _ EMPLOYER <:;'At<.Ftc4J>J°dfooL DtJ'112.t<...T 3£) 2- NUMBER ms.£"•f ,/. 87J - CROSS-CHECK OF RECORDS The undersigned age Public Employment Relations C that he/she has conducted a .ck of records in re·· sults were as follows: Number of Employees Number of Records Counted as Valid PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Comnission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: 1. Approximate number of eligible ~oters ............................... . _t_.:5" __ _ 2. Void Ballots ....... ·. ................................................ . -----3. Votes Cast For: WtflT~~ C£Jv~rt .9<JUmf>I..) ~A-~ON_.··· / "Z.-4 Votes Cast For: 5. Votes Cast For: -·-·-····------6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION ................................... ·--·0·- ----7. Valid Ba 11 ots Counted. ( tota 1 of 3, 4, 5, and 6) ...................... _ _!.__"?::-__ 8. Cha 1· 1 enged Ba 11 ots.................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --:=_ _ 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8) ..... _12-_ 10. Number of Valid Ba nots Needed to Determine Election ................. J ___ _ Challenges D 0 a a r re e no t suffic , ient in number. to affect the results of the e·lection. _ . []inconclusive. lhe results of the election appear to be~ conclusive favoring choice on 1 ine _3_ PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION DATE ISSUED ~ 9p C\f3 The undersigned acted as authorized For For
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.